BJs RESTAURANTS INC Annual Operating Income (Loss) in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
The net result for the period of deducting operating expenses from operating revenues.
Summary
BJs RESTAURANTS INC quarterly/annual Operating Income (Loss) history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • BJs RESTAURANTS INC Operating Income (Loss) for the quarter ending October 1, 2024 was -$2.61M, a 9.26% decline year-over-year.
  • BJs RESTAURANTS INC Operating Income (Loss) for the twelve months ending October 1, 2024 was $22.2M, a 51.2% increase year-over-year.
  • BJs RESTAURANTS INC annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2023 was $13.8M.
  • BJs RESTAURANTS INC annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2022 was -$5.48M, a 66.8% increase from 2021.
  • BJs RESTAURANTS INC annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2021 was -$16.5M, a 80.9% increase from 2020.
Operating Income (Loss), Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), Annual (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $13.8M +$19.2M Jan 4, 2023 Jan 2, 2024 10-K 2024-02-27
2022 -$5.48M +$11M +66.8% Dec 29, 2021 Jan 3, 2023 10-K 2024-02-27
2021 -$16.5M +$69.9M +80.9% Dec 30, 2020 Dec 28, 2021 10-K 2024-02-27
2020 -$86.4M -$136M -276% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 29, 2020 10-K 2023-02-28
2019 $49.1M -$8.45M -14.7% Jan 2, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-02-25
2018 $57.6M +$19.7M +51.9% Jan 3, 2018 Jan 1, 2019 10-K 2021-03-01
2017 $37.9M -$23.7M -38.5% Jan 4, 2017 Jan 2, 2018 10-K 2020-02-25
2016 $61.6M -$1.42M -2.25% Dec 30, 2015 Jan 3, 2017 10-K 2019-02-26
2015 $63.1M +$27.6M +78% Dec 31, 2014 Dec 29, 2015 10-K 2018-02-26
2014 $35.4M +$11.6M +48.5% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 30, 2014 10-K 2017-02-28
2013 $23.9M -$17M -41.6% Jan 2, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2016-02-23
2012 $40.9M -$1.52M -3.59% Jan 4, 2012 Jan 1, 2013 10-K 2015-02-26
2011 $42.4M +$12.2M +40.6% Dec 29, 2010 Jan 3, 2012 10-K 2014-02-25
2010 $30.2M Dec 30, 2009 Dec 28, 2010 10-K 2013-02-25
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.