Civeo Corp Annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from 2012 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
Civeo Corp quarterly/annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2012 to 2023.
  • Civeo Corp Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending December 31, 2023 was $10.9M, a 21.6% decline year-over-year.
  • Civeo Corp Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the twelve months ending December 31, 2023 was $11.8M, a 20.8% decline year-over-year.
  • Civeo Corp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was $11.8M, a 20.8% decline from 2022.
  • Civeo Corp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $14.9M, a 50.5% increase from 2021.
  • Civeo Corp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2021 was $9.9M, a 17.9% increase from 2020.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $11.8M -$3.1M -20.8% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-02-29
2022 $14.9M +$5M +50.5% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-02-29
2021 $9.9M +$1.5M +17.9% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2024-02-29
2020 $8.4M -$5.5M -39.6% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2023-03-01
2019 $13.9M -$2.5M -15.2% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-02-28
2018 $16.4M +$1M +6.49% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2021-02-26
2017 $15.4M -$1M -6.1% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2020-02-27
2016 $16.4M +$10.8M +193% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2019-02-27
2015 $5.6M -$3.3M -37.1% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-02-23
2014 $8.9M +$2.5M +39.1% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-02-23
2013 $6.4M +$3.1M +93.9% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2016-02-26
2012 $3.3M Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 10-K 2015-03-13
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.