U.S. SILICA HOLDINGS, INC. Annual Interest Expense in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of the cost of borrowed funds accounted for as interest expense.
Summary
U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. quarterly/annual Interest Expense history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. Interest Expense for the quarter ending March 31, 2024 was $24.3M, a 0.84% increase year-over-year.
  • U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. Interest Expense for the twelve months ending March 31, 2024 was $102M, a 20.6% increase year-over-year.
  • U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. annual Interest Expense for 2023 was $102M, a 31.1% increase from 2022.
  • U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. annual Interest Expense for 2022 was $77.6M, a 9.05% increase from 2021.
  • U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. annual Interest Expense for 2021 was $71.2M, a 10.9% decline from 2020.
Interest Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Interest Expense, Annual (USD)
Interest Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $102M +$24.1M +31.1% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-02-27
2022 $77.6M +$6.44M +9.05% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-02-27
2021 $71.2M -$8.73M -10.9% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2024-02-27
2020 $79.9M -$15.6M -16.3% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2023-02-24
2019 $95.5M +$24.9M +35.3% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-02-25
2018 $70.6M +$39.2M +125% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2021-02-26
2017 $31.3M +$3.37M +12% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2020-02-25
2016 $28M +$689K +2.53% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2019-02-20
2015 $27.3M +$9.08M +49.9% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2016-02-24
2014 $18.2M +$2.86M +18.6% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2016-02-24
2013 $15.3M +$1.55M +11.2% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2015-02-25
2012 $13.8M -$4.61M -25.1% Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 10-K 2015-02-25
2011 $18.4M -$4.63M -20.1% Jan 1, 2011 Dec 31, 2011 10-K 2014-02-26
2010 $23M Jan 1, 2010 Dec 31, 2010 10-K 2013-02-26
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.