Arq, Inc. Annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from 2012 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
Arq, Inc. quarterly/annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2012 to 2023.
  • Arq, Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending September 30, 2024 was $750K, a 6.84% increase year-over-year.
  • Arq, Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the twelve months ending September 30, 2024 was $3.02M, a 29.4% increase year-over-year.
  • Arq, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was $2.65M, a 33.7% increase from 2022.
  • Arq, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $1.98M, a 2.8% increase from 2021.
  • Arq, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2021 was $1.93M, a 22.8% decline from 2020.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $2.65M +$667K +33.7% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-03-12
2022 $1.98M +$54K +2.8% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-03-12
2021 $1.93M -$569K -22.8% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2023-03-08
2020 $2.5M +$485K +24.1% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2022-03-08
2019 $2.01M -$479K -19.2% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2021-03-10
2018 $2.49M +$281K +12.7% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2020-03-16
2017 $2.21M -$659K -23% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2019-03-18
2016 $2.87M -$4.34M -60.2% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2018-03-12
2015 $7.2M +$2.49M +52.9% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-03-12
2014 $4.71M +$2.4M +104% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-03-13
2013 $2.31M +$1.66M +256% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2016-04-19
2012 $649K Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 10-K/A 2016-03-17
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.