Two Hands Corp Annual Operating Income (Loss) in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
The net result for the period of deducting operating expenses from operating revenues.
Summary
Two Hands Corp quarterly/annual Operating Income (Loss) history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • Two Hands Corp Operating Income (Loss) for the quarter ending June 30, 2024 was -$266K, a 0.52% decline year-over-year.
  • Two Hands Corp Operating Income (Loss) for the twelve months ending June 30, 2024 was -$1.22M, a 66.5% increase year-over-year.
  • Two Hands Corp annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2023 was -$1.28M, a 92.8% increase from 2022.
  • Two Hands Corp annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2022 was -$17.8M, a 461% decline from 2021.
  • Two Hands Corp annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2021 was -$3.17M, a 42.4% increase from 2020.
Operating Income (Loss), Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), Annual (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 -$1.28M +$16.5M +92.8% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-04-01
2022 -$17.8M -$14.6M -461% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-04-01
2021 -$3.17M +$2.33M +42.4% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2023-04-03
2020 -$5.5M -$1.8M -48.7% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2022-03-31
2019 -$3.7M +$797K +17.7% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2021-03-29
2018 -$4.5M -$3.65M -430% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2020-03-27
2017 -$849K -$174K -25.8% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2019-04-01
2016 -$675K -$80.1K -13.5% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2018-03-29
2015 -$595K +$6.05M +91% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2017-03-31
2014 -$6.64M -$6.48M -3956% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2016-03-29
2013 -$164K +$150K +47.8% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2015-04-15
2012 -$313K +$4.98M +94.1% Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 10-K 2014-04-15
2011 -$5.29M -$5.19M -4853% Jan 1, 2011 Dec 31, 2011 10-K 2013-04-15
2010 -$107K Jan 1, 2010 Dec 31, 2010 10-K/A 2012-04-02
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.