META MATERIALS INC. Quarterly Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from Q2 2020 to Q1 2024

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
Meta Materials Inc. quarterly/annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from Q2 2020 to Q1 2024.
  • Meta Materials Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending March 31, 2024 was $311K, a 83.3% decline year-over-year.
  • Meta Materials Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the twelve months ending March 31, 2024 was -$1.85M.
  • Meta Materials Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was -$299K, a 102% decline from 2022.
  • Meta Materials Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $13.6M, a 1186% increase from 2021.
  • Meta Materials Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2021 was $1.06M, a 29.9% decline from 2020.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Quarterly (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Quarterly Growth (%)
Period TTM Value Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
Q1 2024 -$1.85M $311K -$1.55M -83.3% Jan 1, 2024 Mar 31, 2024 10-Q 2024-05-13
Q4 2023 -$299K $372K Oct 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-03-28
Q3 2023 $279K -$2.11M -88.3% Jul 1, 2023 Sep 30, 2023 10-Q 2023-11-13
Q2 2023 -$2.81M -$6.72M -172% Apr 1, 2023 Jun 30, 2023 10-Q 2023-08-09
Q1 2023 $1.86M Jan 1, 2023 Mar 31, 2023 10-Q 2024-05-13
Q3 2022 $2.39M +$2.19M +1090% Jul 1, 2022 Sep 30, 2022 10-Q 2023-11-13
Q2 2022 $3.92M +$3.69M +1641% Apr 1, 2022 Jun 30, 2022 10-Q 2023-08-09
Q3 2021 $201K -$194K -49.2% Jul 1, 2021 Sep 30, 2021 10-Q 2021-11-15
Q2 2021 $225K -$141K -38.5% Apr 1, 2021 Jun 30, 2021 10-Q 2021-08-13
Q3 2020 $395K Jul 1, 2020 Sep 30, 2020 10-Q 2021-11-15
Q2 2020 $366K Apr 1, 2020 Jun 30, 2020 10-Q 2021-08-13
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.