iBio, Inc. Annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from 2012 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
iBio, Inc. quarterly/annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2012 to 2023.
  • iBio, Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending March 31, 2024 was $454K, a 17.9% increase year-over-year.
  • iBio, Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the twelve months ending March 31, 2024 was $2.11M, a 39.6% decline year-over-year.
  • iBio, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was $2.86M, a 27.7% decline from 2022.
  • iBio, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $3.96M, a 150% increase from 2021.
  • iBio, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2021 was $1.59M, a 309% increase from 2020.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $2.86M -$1.1M -27.7% Jul 1, 2022 Jun 30, 2023 10-K 2023-09-27
2022 $3.96M +$2.37M +150% Jul 1, 2021 Jun 30, 2022 10-K 2023-09-27
2021 $1.59M +$1.2M +309% Jul 1, 2020 Jun 30, 2021 10-K 2022-10-11
2020 $388K +$147K +61% Jul 1, 2019 Jun 30, 2020 10-K 2021-09-28
2019 $241K -$529K -68.7% Jul 1, 2018 Jun 30, 2019 10-K 2020-10-13
2018 $770K -$240K -23.8% Jul 1, 2017 Jun 30, 2018 10-K 2019-08-26
2017 $1.01M -$255K -20.2% Jul 1, 2016 Jun 30, 2017 10-K 2018-09-18
2016 $1.27M +$351K +38.4% Jul 1, 2015 Jun 30, 2016 10-K 2017-09-15
2015 $914K -$161K -15% Jul 1, 2014 Jun 30, 2015 10-K 2016-10-13
2014 $1.08M -$188K -14.9% Jul 1, 2013 Jun 30, 2014 10-K 2015-10-13
2013 $1.26M -$1.42M -52.9% Jul 1, 2012 Jun 30, 2013 10-K 2014-09-29
2012 $2.68M Jul 1, 2011 Jun 30, 2012 10-K/A 2013-10-04
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.