AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC. Annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from 2013 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
Amc Entertainment Holdings, Inc. quarterly/annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2013 to 2023.
  • Amc Entertainment Holdings, Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending June 30, 2024 was $4.5M, a 42.3% decline year-over-year.
  • Amc Entertainment Holdings, Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the twelve months ending June 30, 2024 was $17.6M, a 41.9% decline year-over-year.
  • Amc Entertainment Holdings, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was $42.5M, a 88.9% increase from 2022.
  • Amc Entertainment Holdings, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $22.5M, a 47.8% decline from 2021.
  • Amc Entertainment Holdings, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2021 was $43.1M, a 69.7% increase from 2020.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $42.5M +$20M +88.9% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-02-28
2022 $22.5M -$20.6M -47.8% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-02-28
2021 $43.1M +$17.7M +69.7% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2024-02-28
2020 $25.4M +$21M +477% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2023-02-28
2019 $4.4M Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-03-01
2017 $5.7M +$800K +16.3% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2018-03-01
2016 $4.9M -$5.6M -53.3% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2018-03-01
2015 $10.5M -$793K -7.02% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-03-01
2014 $11.3M -$707K -5.89% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-03-10
2013 $12M Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2016-03-08
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.