Green Brick Partners, Inc. Annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from 2012 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
Green Brick Partners, Inc. quarterly/annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2012 to 2023.
  • Green Brick Partners, Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending September 30, 2024 was $600K, a 100% increase year-over-year.
  • Green Brick Partners, Inc. Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the twelve months ending September 30, 2024 was $8.27M, a 27.6% increase year-over-year.
  • Green Brick Partners, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was $6.8M, a 94.3% increase from 2022.
  • Green Brick Partners, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $3.5M, a 12.9% increase from 2021.
  • Green Brick Partners, Inc. annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2021 was $3.1M, a 47.6% increase from 2020.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $6.8M +$3.3M +94.3% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-02-29
2022 $3.5M +$400K +12.9% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2023-02-27
2021 $3.1M +$1M +47.6% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2022-03-01
2020 $2.1M -$100K -4.55% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2021-03-08
2019 $2.2M Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2020-03-06
2017 $2.6M +$1.3M +100% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2018-03-12
2016 $1.3M +$800K +160% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2018-03-12
2015 $500K +$400K +400% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-03-12
2014 $100K +$100K Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-03-13
2013 $0 $0 Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2015-03-31
2012 $0 Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 10-K 2015-03-31
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.