Palo Alto Networks Inc Annual Operating Income (Loss) in USD from 2011 to 2024

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
The net result for the period of deducting operating expenses from operating revenues.
Summary
Palo Alto Networks Inc quarterly/annual Operating Income (Loss) history and growth rate from 2011 to 2024.
  • Palo Alto Networks Inc Operating Income (Loss) for the quarter ending July 31, 2024 was $238M, a 5.96% decline year-over-year.
  • Palo Alto Networks Inc Operating Income (Loss) for the twelve months ending July 31, 2024 was $684M, a 76.6% increase year-over-year.
  • Palo Alto Networks Inc annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2024 was $684M, a 76.6% increase from 2023.
  • Palo Alto Networks Inc annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2023 was $387M.
  • Palo Alto Networks Inc annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2022 was -$189M, a 37.9% increase from 2021.
Operating Income (Loss), Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), Annual (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2024 $684M +$297M +76.6% Aug 1, 2023 Jul 31, 2024 10-K 2024-09-06
2023 $387M +$576M Aug 1, 2022 Jul 31, 2023 10-K 2024-09-06
2022 -$189M +$115M +37.9% Aug 1, 2021 Jul 31, 2022 10-K 2024-09-06
2021 -$304M -$125M -69.9% Aug 1, 2020 Jul 31, 2021 10-K 2023-09-01
2020 -$179M -$125M -231% Aug 1, 2019 Jul 31, 2020 10-K 2022-09-06
2019 -$54.1M +$50.1M +48.1% Aug 1, 2018 Jul 31, 2019 10-K 2021-09-03
2018 -$104M +$61.6M +37.2% Aug 1, 2017 Jul 31, 2018 10-K 2020-09-04
2017 -$166M -$8.5M -5.4% Aug 1, 2016 Jul 31, 2017 10-K 2019-09-09
2016 -$157M -$57.5M -57.6% Aug 1, 2015 Jul 31, 2016 10-K 2018-09-13
2015 -$99.8M +$116M +53.6% Aug 1, 2014 Jul 31, 2015 10-K 2017-09-07
2014 -$215M -$197M -1056% Aug 1, 2013 Jul 31, 2014 10-K 2016-09-08
2013 -$18.6M -$22.5M -579% Aug 1, 2012 Jul 31, 2013 10-K 2015-09-17
2012 $3.89M +$14.3M Aug 1, 2011 Jul 31, 2012 10-K 2014-09-18
2011 -$10.4M Aug 1, 2010 Jul 31, 2011 10-K 2013-09-25
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.