TransDigm Group INC Annual Operating Income (Loss) in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
The net result for the period of deducting operating expenses from operating revenues.
Summary
TransDigm Group INC quarterly/annual Operating Income (Loss) history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • TransDigm Group INC Operating Income (Loss) for the quarter ending June 29, 2024 was $934M, a 19.3% increase year-over-year.
  • TransDigm Group INC Operating Income (Loss) for the twelve months ending June 29, 2024 was $3.44B, a 27.1% increase year-over-year.
  • TransDigm Group INC annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2023 was $2.92B, a 32% increase from 2022.
  • TransDigm Group INC annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2022 was $2.22B, a 31% increase from 2021.
  • TransDigm Group INC annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2021 was $1.69B, a 3.43% decline from 2020.
Operating Income (Loss), Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), Annual (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $2.92B +$708M +32% Oct 1, 2022 Sep 30, 2023 10-K 2023-11-09
2022 $2.22B +$524M +31% Oct 1, 2021 Sep 30, 2022 10-K 2023-11-09
2021 $1.69B -$60M -3.43% Oct 1, 2020 Sep 30, 2021 10-K 2023-11-09
2020 $1.75B -$175M -9.09% Oct 1, 2019 Sep 30, 2020 10-K 2022-11-10
2019 $1.93B +$271M +16.4% Oct 1, 2018 Sep 30, 2019 10-K 2021-11-16
2018 $1.66B +$172M +11.6% Oct 1, 2017 Sep 30, 2018 10-K 2020-11-12
2017 $1.48B +$215M +17% Oct 1, 2016 Sep 30, 2017 10-K 2019-11-19
2016 $1.27B +$194M +18% Oct 1, 2015 Sep 30, 2016 10-K 2018-11-09
2015 $1.07B +$146M +15.8% Oct 1, 2014 Sep 30, 2015 10-K 2017-11-13
2014 $928M +$178M +23.8% Oct 1, 2013 Sep 30, 2014 10-K 2016-11-15
2013 $749M +$49.7M +7.1% Oct 1, 2012 Sep 30, 2013 10-K 2015-11-13
2012 $700M +$213M +43.7% Oct 1, 2011 Sep 30, 2012 10-K 2014-11-14
2011 $487M +$124M +34.2% Oct 1, 2010 Sep 30, 2011 8-K 2013-08-12
2010 $363M Oct 1, 2009 Sep 30, 2010 8-K 2013-08-12
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.