WYNN RESORTS LTD Annual Depreciation in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
The amount of expense recognized in the current period that reflects the allocation of the cost of tangible assets over the assets' useful lives. Includes production and non-production related depreciation.
Summary
Wynn Resorts Ltd quarterly/annual Depreciation history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • Wynn Resorts Ltd Depreciation for the quarter ending September 30, 2024 was $143M, a 8.59% decline year-over-year.
  • Wynn Resorts Ltd Depreciation for the twelve months ending September 30, 2024 was $623M, a 0.3% decline year-over-year.
  • Wynn Resorts Ltd annual Depreciation for 2023 was $625M, a 4.16% decline from 2022.
  • Wynn Resorts Ltd annual Depreciation for 2022 was $652M, a 4.9% decline from 2021.
  • Wynn Resorts Ltd annual Depreciation for 2021 was $686M, a 1.99% decline from 2020.
Depreciation, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Depreciation, Annual (USD)
Depreciation, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $625M -$27.1M -4.16% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-02-23
2022 $652M -$33.6M -4.9% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-02-23
2021 $686M -$13.9M -1.99% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2024-02-23
2020 $700M +$96.7M +16% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2023-02-27
2019 $603M +$56.8M +10.4% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-02-28
2018 $546M -$1.8M -0.33% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2021-02-26
2017 $548M +$150M +37.6% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2020-02-28
2016 $398M +$80.4M +25.3% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2019-02-28
2015 $318M +$6.2M +1.99% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-02-28
2014 $312M -$55.8M -15.2% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-02-24
2013 $367M +$300K +0.08% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2014-02-28
2012 $367M -$22.7M -5.82% Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 10-K 2014-02-28
2011 $390M -$5.1M -1.29% Jan 1, 2011 Dec 31, 2011 10-K 2014-02-28
2010 $395M Jan 1, 2010 Dec 31, 2010 10-K 2013-03-01
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.