VISTEON CORP Annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from 2011 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
Visteon Corp annual/quarterly Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2011 to 2023.
  • Visteon Corp Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending December 31, 2022 was $8M, a 60% increase year-over-year.
  • Visteon Corp Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the twelve months ending December 31, 2022 was $27M, a 50% increase year-over-year.
  • Visteon Corp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was $36M, a 33.3% increase from 2022.
  • Visteon Corp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $27M, a 50% increase from 2021.
  • Visteon Corp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2021 was $18M, unchanged from 2020.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $36M +$9M +33.3% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-02-20
2022 $27M +$9M +50% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-02-20
2021 $18M $0 0% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2024-02-20
2020 $18M +$1M +5.88% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2023-02-16
2019 $17M +$9M +113% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-02-17
2018 $8M -$4M -33.3% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2021-02-18
2017 $12M +$4M +50% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2020-02-20
2016 $8M $0 0% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2019-02-21
2015 $8M -$4M -33.3% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-02-22
2014 $12M -$4M -25% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-02-23
2013 $16M -$7M -30.4% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2016-02-25
2012 $23M -$16M -41% Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 8-K 2015-09-11
2011 $39M Jan 1, 2011 Dec 31, 2011 10-K 2014-02-25
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.