LITHIA MOTORS INC Annual Operating Income (Loss) in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
The net result for the period of deducting operating expenses from operating revenues.
Summary
Lithia Motors Inc quarterly/annual Operating Income (Loss) history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • Lithia Motors Inc Operating Income (Loss) for the quarter ending September 30, 2024 was $424M, a 8.83% decline year-over-year.
  • Lithia Motors Inc Operating Income (Loss) for the twelve months ending September 30, 2024 was $1.53B, a 11% decline year-over-year.
  • Lithia Motors Inc annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2023 was $1.69B, a 12.8% decline from 2022.
  • Lithia Motors Inc annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2022 was $1.94B, a 16.8% increase from 2021.
  • Lithia Motors Inc annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2021 was $1.66B, a 140% increase from 2020.
Operating Income (Loss), Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), Annual (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $1.69B -$249M -12.8% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-02-23
2022 $1.94B +$279M +16.8% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-02-23
2021 $1.66B +$970M +140% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2024-02-23
2020 $693M +$198M +39.9% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2023-02-24
2019 $495M +$48M +10.7% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-02-18
2018 $447M +$38M +9.29% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2021-02-19
2017 $409M +$70.6M +20.9% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K/A 2020-02-28
2016 $338M +$35.7M +11.8% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2019-02-25
2015 $303M +$70.8M +30.5% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-02-23
2014 $232M +$48.4M +26.4% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-02-28
2013 $184M +$35.1M +23.7% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2016-02-26
2012 $148M +$37.6M +33.9% Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 10-K 2015-03-02
2011 $111M +$64.3M +138% Jan 1, 2011 Dec 31, 2011 10-K 2014-02-21
2010 $46.5M Jan 1, 2010 Dec 31, 2010 10-K 2013-02-22
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.