BEAZER HOMES USA INC Annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from 2013 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
Beazer Homes Usa Inc quarterly/annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2013 to 2023.
  • Beazer Homes Usa Inc Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending June 30, 2024 was $2.47M, a 24.4% increase year-over-year.
  • Beazer Homes Usa Inc Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the twelve months ending June 30, 2024 was $7.56M, a 4.91% increase year-over-year.
  • Beazer Homes Usa Inc annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was $7.28M, a 14.2% decline from 2022.
  • Beazer Homes Usa Inc annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $8.48M, a 30.3% decline from 2021.
  • Beazer Homes Usa Inc annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2021 was $12.2M, a 21.2% increase from 2020.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $7.28M -$1.2M -14.2% Oct 1, 2022 Sep 30, 2023 10-K 2023-11-16
2022 $8.48M -$3.69M -30.3% Oct 1, 2021 Sep 30, 2022 10-K 2023-11-16
2021 $12.2M +$2.13M +21.2% Oct 1, 2020 Sep 30, 2021 10-K 2023-11-16
2020 $10M -$490K -4.66% Oct 1, 2019 Sep 30, 2020 10-K 2022-11-10
2019 $10.5M +$268K +2.61% Oct 1, 2018 Sep 30, 2019 10-K 2021-11-10
2018 $10.3M +$2.1M +25.7% Oct 1, 2017 Sep 30, 2018 10-K 2018-11-13
2017 $8.16M +$200K +2.51% Oct 1, 2016 Sep 30, 2017 10-K 2018-11-13
2016 $7.96M +$1.85M +30.4% Oct 1, 2015 Sep 30, 2016 10-K 2018-11-13
2015 $6.11M +$3.53M +137% Oct 1, 2014 Sep 30, 2015 10-K 2017-11-14
2014 $2.57M -$326K -11.2% Oct 1, 2013 Sep 30, 2014 10-K 2016-11-15
2013 $2.9M Oct 1, 2012 Sep 30, 2013 10-K 2015-11-10
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.