GIBRALTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. Annual Cost of Revenue in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
The aggregate cost of goods produced and sold and services rendered during the reporting period.
Summary
Gibraltar Industries, Inc. quarterly/annual Cost of Revenue history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • Gibraltar Industries, Inc. Cost of Revenue for the quarter ending September 30, 2024 was $268M, a 6.2% decline year-over-year.
  • Gibraltar Industries, Inc. Cost of Revenue for the twelve months ending September 30, 2024 was $979M, a 3.54% decline year-over-year.
  • Gibraltar Industries, Inc. annual Cost of Revenue for 2023 was $1.02B, a 5.18% decline from 2022.
  • Gibraltar Industries, Inc. annual Cost of Revenue for 2022 was $1.07B, a 2.05% increase from 2021.
  • Gibraltar Industries, Inc. annual Cost of Revenue for 2021 was $1.05B, a 35.2% increase from 2020.
Cost of Revenue, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Cost of Revenue, Annual (USD)
Cost of Revenue, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $1.02B -$55.5M -5.18% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-02-21
2022 $1.07B +$21.5M +2.05% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-02-21
2021 $1.05B +$274M +35.2% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2024-02-21
2020 $776M +$97.9M +14.4% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2023-02-22
2019 $678M +$52.2M +8.33% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-02-23
2018 $626M -$124M -16.6% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2021-02-25
2017 $750M -$12.8M -1.68% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2020-02-28
2016 $763M -$90.7M -10.6% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2019-02-27
2015 $854M +$132M +18.3% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-02-27
2014 $722M +$52.6M +7.85% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-02-21
2013 $669M +$29M +4.52% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2016-02-18
2012 $640M +$19M +3.06% Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 10-K 2015-02-24
2011 $621M +$87.9M +16.5% Jan 1, 2011 Dec 31, 2011 10-K 2014-02-20
2010 $534M Jan 1, 2010 Dec 31, 2010 10-K 2013-02-22
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.