TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC Annual Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of deferred income tax expense (benefit) pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations.
Summary
Tyler Technologies Inc quarterly/annual Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • Tyler Technologies Inc Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for the quarter ending March 31, 2024 was -$24.3M, a 31.1% decline year-over-year.
  • Tyler Technologies Inc annual Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2023 was -$73.7M, a 15.5% increase from 2022.
  • Tyler Technologies Inc annual Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2022 was -$87.2M, a 557% decline from 2021.
  • Tyler Technologies Inc annual Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2021 was -$13.3M, a 67.2% decline from 2020.
Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit), Annual (USD)
Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit), YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 -$73.7M +$13.5M +15.5% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-02-21
2022 -$87.2M -$73.9M -557% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-02-21
2021 -$13.3M -$5.34M -67.2% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2024-02-21
2020 -$7.94M -$1.85M -30.4% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2023-02-22
2019 -$6.09M -$1.02M -20.1% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-02-23
2018 -$5.07M +$28.6M +84.9% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2021-02-19
2017 -$33.7M -$7.23M -27.4% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2020-02-19
2016 -$26.4M -$18.5M -232% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2019-02-20
2015 -$7.96M -$4.15M -109% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-02-21
2014 -$3.8M -$2.31M -154% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-02-22
2013 -$1.5M -$1.28M -596% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2016-02-24
2012 -$215K +$2.7M +92.6% Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 10-K 2015-02-18
2011 -$2.92M -$1.96M -204% Jan 1, 2011 Dec 31, 2011 10-K 2014-02-19
2010 -$959K Jan 1, 2010 Dec 31, 2010 10-K 2013-02-20
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.