Clearfield, Inc. Annual Operating Income (Loss) in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
The net result for the period of deducting operating expenses from operating revenues.
Summary
Clearfield, Inc. quarterly/annual Operating Income (Loss) history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • Clearfield, Inc. Operating Income (Loss) for the quarter ending June 30, 2024 was -$2.31M, a 141% decline year-over-year.
  • Clearfield, Inc. Operating Income (Loss) for the twelve months ending June 30, 2024 was -$18.5M, a 132% decline year-over-year.
  • Clearfield, Inc. annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2023 was $37.3M, a 41.6% decline from 2022.
  • Clearfield, Inc. annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2022 was $63.8M, a 153% increase from 2021.
  • Clearfield, Inc. annual Operating Income (Loss) for 2021 was $25.2M, a 201% increase from 2020.
Operating Income (Loss), Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), Annual (USD)
Operating Income (Loss), YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $37.3M -$26.5M -41.6% Oct 1, 2022 Sep 30, 2023 10-K 2023-11-29
2022 $63.8M +$38.6M +153% Oct 1, 2021 Sep 30, 2022 10-K 2023-11-29
2021 $25.2M +$16.9M +201% Oct 1, 2020 Sep 30, 2021 10-K 2023-11-29
2020 $8.38M +$3.2M +61.6% Oct 1, 2019 Sep 30, 2020 10-K 2022-11-23
2019 $5.19M +$117K +2.31% Oct 1, 2018 Sep 30, 2019 10-K 2020-11-12
2018 $5.07M -$241K -4.54% Oct 1, 2017 Sep 30, 2018 10-K 2019-11-15
2017 $5.31M -$5.42M -50.5% Oct 1, 2016 Sep 30, 2017 10-K 2019-11-15
2016 $10.7M +$3.68M +52.2% Oct 1, 2015 Sep 30, 2016 10-K 2018-11-14
2015 $7.05M -$1.47M -17.2% Oct 1, 2014 Sep 30, 2015 10-K 2017-11-15
2014 $8.52M +$1.07M +14.4% Oct 1, 2013 Sep 30, 2014 10-K 2016-11-22
2013 $7.44M +$3.17M +74.2% Oct 1, 2012 Sep 30, 2013 10-K 2015-11-25
2012 $4.27M +$559K +15% Oct 1, 2011 Sep 30, 2012 10-K 2014-11-26
2011 $3.72M +$2.59M +231% Oct 1, 2010 Sep 30, 2011 10-K 2012-12-04
2010 $1.12M Oct 1, 2009 Sep 30, 2010 10-K 2011-11-30
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.