OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC Annual Income Tax Expense (Benefit) in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of current income tax expense (benefit) and deferred income tax expense (benefit) pertaining to continuing operations.
Summary
Oppenheimer Holdings Inc quarterly/annual Income Tax Expense (Benefit) history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • Oppenheimer Holdings Inc Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for the quarter ending September 30, 2024 was $10.9M, a 39.1% increase year-over-year.
  • Oppenheimer Holdings Inc Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for the twelve months ending September 30, 2024 was $34.4M, a 89.6% increase year-over-year.
  • Oppenheimer Holdings Inc annual Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2023 was $16.5M, a 22.7% increase from 2022.
  • Oppenheimer Holdings Inc annual Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2022 was $13.4M, a 79.5% decline from 2021.
  • Oppenheimer Holdings Inc annual Income Tax Expense (Benefit) for 2021 was $65.7M, a 42.7% increase from 2020.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit), Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit), Annual (USD)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit), YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $16.5M +$3.05M +22.7% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-03-01
2022 $13.4M -$52.2M -79.5% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-03-01
2021 $65.7M +$19.7M +42.7% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2024-03-01
2020 $46M +$24.1M +110% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2023-02-28
2019 $22M +$5.98M +37.4% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-02-28
2018 $16M Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2021-03-01
2015 $3.81M -$12.4M -76.4% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2016-03-04
2014 $16.2M -$1.58M -8.9% Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2016-03-04
2013 $17.8M +$17.4M +5380% Jan 1, 2013 Dec 31, 2013 10-K 2016-03-04
2012 $324K -$4.91M -93.8% Jan 1, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 10-K 2015-03-06
2011 $5.23M -$22M -80.8% Jan 1, 2011 Dec 31, 2011 10-K 2014-03-07
2010 $27.2M Jan 1, 2010 Dec 31, 2010 10-K 2013-03-06
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.