KOPIN CORP Annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from 2010 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
Kopin Corp quarterly/annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2010 to 2023.
  • Kopin Corp Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending June 29, 2024 was $676K, a 43.2% decline year-over-year.
  • Kopin Corp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was $3.88M, a 206% increase from 2022.
  • Kopin Corp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $1.27M, a 71.3% decline from 2021.
  • Kopin Corp annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2021 was $4.42M, a 438% increase from 2020.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $3.88M +$2.61M +206% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 30, 2023 10-K 2024-03-14
2022 $1.27M -$3.15M -71.3% Dec 26, 2021 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-03-14
2021 $4.42M +$3.6M +438% Dec 27, 2020 Dec 25, 2021 10-K 2024-03-14
2020 $821K -$1.24M -60.1% Dec 29, 2019 Dec 26, 2020 10-K 2023-03-14
2019 $2.06M -$2.73M -57.1% Dec 30, 2018 Dec 28, 2019 10-K 2022-03-14
2018 $4.79M +$2.49M +109% Dec 31, 2017 Dec 29, 2018 10-K 2021-03-05
2017 $2.3M -$129K -5.33% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 30, 2017 10-K 2020-03-11
2016 $2.43M -$720K -22.9% Dec 27, 2015 Dec 31, 2016 10-K/A 2019-11-07
2015 $3.15M -$1.68M -34.8% Dec 28, 2014 Dec 26, 2015 10-K 2018-03-23
2014 $4.83M $0 0% Dec 29, 2013 Dec 27, 2014 10-K 2016-03-04
2013 $4.83M +$341K +7.6% Dec 30, 2012 Dec 28, 2013 10-K 2017-03-23
2012 $4.49M +$563K +14.4% Jan 1, 2012 Dec 29, 2012 10-K 2015-03-12
2011 $3.92M +$1.34M +51.9% Dec 26, 2010 Dec 31, 2011 10-K 2014-03-17
2010 $2.58M Dec 27, 2009 Dec 25, 2010 10-K 2013-03-18
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.