FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES INC Annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense in USD from 2014 to 2023

Taxonomy & unit
us-gaap: USD
Description
Amount of expense for award under share-based payment arrangement. Excludes amount capitalized.
Summary
First Financial Bankshares Inc quarterly/annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense history and growth rate from 2014 to 2023.
  • First Financial Bankshares Inc Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the quarter ending June 30, 2024 was $485K, a 8.99% increase year-over-year.
  • First Financial Bankshares Inc Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for the twelve months ending June 30, 2024 was $1.84M, a 8.66% increase year-over-year.
  • First Financial Bankshares Inc annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2023 was $1.76M, a 22.4% increase from 2022.
  • First Financial Bankshares Inc annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2022 was $1.44M, a 9.42% increase from 2021.
  • First Financial Bankshares Inc annual Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense for 2021 was $1.32M, a 4.43% decline from 2020.
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Trailing 12 Months (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, Annual (USD)
Share-based Payment Arrangement, Expense, YoY Annual Growth (%)
Period Value YoY Chg Change % Start Date End Date Report Filed
2023 $1.76M +$323K +22.4% Jan 1, 2023 Dec 31, 2023 10-K 2024-02-26
2022 $1.44M +$124K +9.42% Jan 1, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10-K 2024-02-26
2021 $1.32M -$61K -4.43% Jan 1, 2021 Dec 31, 2021 10-K 2024-02-26
2020 $1.38M -$112K -7.52% Jan 1, 2020 Dec 31, 2020 10-K 2023-02-23
2019 $1.49M -$19K -1.26% Jan 1, 2019 Dec 31, 2019 10-K 2022-02-22
2018 $1.51M -$237K -13.6% Jan 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 10-K 2021-02-22
2017 $1.75M +$863K +97.8% Jan 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017 10-K 2020-02-14
2016 $882K +$238K +37% Jan 1, 2016 Dec 31, 2016 10-K 2019-02-19
2015 $644K -$65K -9.17% Jan 1, 2015 Dec 31, 2015 10-K 2018-02-16
2014 $709K Jan 1, 2014 Dec 31, 2014 10-K 2017-02-17
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the value indicates that the value is likely invalid.