Jeff Alexander Walsh - Jun 6, 2023 Form 4/A - Amendment Insider Report for loanDepot, Inc. (LDI)

Signature
/s/ Amanda Darby, as Attorney-in-Fact for Jeff Walsh
Stock symbol
LDI
Transactions as of
Jun 6, 2023
Transactions value $
-$131,279
Form type
4/A - Amendment
Date filed
7/20/2023, 05:48 PM
Date Of Original Report
Jun 8, 2023
Previous filing
May 23, 2023
Next filing
Jul 5, 2023

Transactions Table

Type Sym Class Transaction Value $ Shares Change % * Price $ Shares After Date Ownership Footnotes
transaction LDI Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share Sale -$85.4K -42.9K -1.01% $1.99 4.2M Jun 6, 2023 Direct F1, F2
transaction LDI Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share Sale -$45.8K -21.4K -0.51% $2.15 4.17M Jun 7, 2023 Direct F1, F3
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.

Explanation of Responses:

Id Content
F1 The sales reported in this Form 4 were effected pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan adopted by the Reporting Person on December 8, 2022.
F2 The price reported in Column 4 is a weighted average price. The shares were sold in multiple transactions at prices ranging from $1.88 to $2.11. The reporting person undertakes to provide the issuer,any security holder of the issuer, or the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, specific trade amounts and pricing within the ranges set forth in this footnote of this Form 4 at which the respective transactions were affected.
F3 The price reported in Column 4 is a weighted average price. The shares were sold in multiple transactions at prices ranging from $2.09 to $2.19. The reporting person undertakes to provide the issuer,any security holder of the issuer, or the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, specific trade amounts and pricing within the ranges set forth in this footnote of this Form 4 at which the respective transactions were affected.

Remarks:

Revised solely to remove the checkmark indicating that the Reporting Person is no longer subject to Section 16 as that box was checked inadvertently. In addition, the transaction reported on the original Form 4 was pursuant to a 10b5-1 plan that was adopted before the new 10b5-1 rules became effective and, as such, the checkbox relating to the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) should not have been checked, which is corrected here as well. The rest of the original Form 4 remains unchanged.