-
Signature
-
/s/ Matthew Gosling, Attorney-in-Fact for Lewis T. "Rusty" Williams
-
Issuer symbol
-
PTGX
-
Transactions as of
-
17 Feb 2026
-
Net transactions value
-
-$1,288,440
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
18 Feb 2026, 18:12:56 UTC
Quoteable Key Fact
"Lewis T. "rusty" Williams filed Form 4 for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc (PTGX) on 18 Feb 2026."
Quick Takeaways
- This page summarizes Lewis T. "rusty" Williams's Form 4 filing for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc (PTGX).
- 3 reported transactions and 1 derivative row are listed below.
- Filing timestamp: 18 Feb 2026, 18:12.
What Changed
- Previous filing in this sequence was filed on 06 Jan 2026.
- Current net transaction value: -$1,288,440.
Why This Matters
- This tells you what this filing adds before you inspect full transaction and derivative tables.
- You can trace every row back to the original SEC filing document.
Reporting Owners (1)
| Name |
Relationship |
Address |
Signature |
Signature date |
CIK |
| Williams Lewis T |
Director |
C/O PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS, INC., 7707 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 140, NEWARK |
/s/ Matthew Gosling, Attorney-in-Fact for Lewis T. "Rusty" Williams |
18 Feb 2026 |
0001475714 |
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
PTGX |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$195,120 |
+18,000 |
+230% |
$10.84 |
25,825 |
17 Feb 2026 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
PTGX |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$1,483,560 |
-18,000 |
-70% |
$82.42 |
7,825 |
17 Feb 2026 |
Direct |
F1 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
PTGX |
Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
+18,000 |
|
$0.000000 |
6,000 |
17 Feb 2026 |
Common Stock |
18,000 |
$10.84 |
Direct |
F2 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Explanation of Responses: