-
Signature
-
Marc Wilson, as attorney-in-fact
-
Issuer symbol
-
CRNX
-
Transactions as of
-
08 May 2024
-
Net transactions value
-
-$4,310,814
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
10 May 2024, 16:57:04 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
CRNX |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$997,117 |
+107,448 |
+42% |
$9.28 |
364,933 |
08 May 2024 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
CRNX |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$5,307,931 |
-107,448 |
-29% |
$49.40 |
257,485 |
08 May 2024 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| holding |
CRNX |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
570,805 |
08 May 2024 |
By Family Trust 1 |
|
| holding |
CRNX |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
110,000 |
08 May 2024 |
By Family Trust 2 |
|
| holding |
CRNX |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
110,000 |
08 May 2024 |
By Family Trust 3 |
|
| holding |
CRNX |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
110,000 |
08 May 2024 |
By Family Trust 4 |
|
| holding |
CRNX |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
08 May 2024 |
By Spouse |
|
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
CRNX |
Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-107,448 |
-87% |
$0.000000 |
16,342 |
08 May 2024 |
Common Stock |
107,448 |
$9.28 |
Direct |
F3 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: