-
Signature
-
/s/ Paul Quinlan, as attorney-in-fact for Laura Sandler
-
Issuer symbol
-
ORKA
-
Transactions as of
-
02 Mar 2026
-
Net transactions value
-
-$128,822
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
02 Mar 2026, 18:47:50 UTC
Reporting Owners (1)
| Name |
Relationship |
Address |
Signature |
Signature date |
CIK |
| Sandler Laura Lee |
Chief Operating Officer |
C/O ORUKA THERAPEUTICS, INC., 855 OAK GROVE AVE., SUITE 100, MENLO PARK |
/s/ Paul Quinlan, as attorney-in-fact for Laura Sandler |
02 Mar 2026 |
0002075401 |
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
ORKA |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$39,000 |
+5,000 |
+2.1% |
$7.80 |
242,584 |
02 Mar 2026 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
ORKA |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$77,386 |
-2,325 |
-0.96% |
$33.28 |
240,259 |
02 Mar 2026 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
ORKA |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$90,436 |
-2,675 |
-1.1% |
$33.81 |
237,584 |
02 Mar 2026 |
Direct |
F1, F3 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
ORKA |
Employee Warrant (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-5,000 |
-5.3% |
$0.000000 |
89,996 |
02 Mar 2026 |
Common Stock |
5,000 |
$7.80 |
Direct |
F4 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: