- Issuer ticker
-
OUST
- Reported as of
-
06 Nov 2026
- Net transaction value
-
-$170,000
Source evidence
Original filing metadata and source links for verification.
4 source fields
- SEC form
-
4
- Accepted by SEC
-
10 Nov 2026, 17:54:05 UTC
Reporting owner
1 detail
- Reporting owner signature
-
/s/ Megan Chung, as Attorney-in-Fact for Stephen A. Skaggs
Filing notes and source
Key filing fact
Stephen A. Skaggs filed Form 4 for Ouster, Inc. (OUST) on 10 Nov 2026.
Key facts
- This page summarizes Stephen A. Skaggs's Form 4 filing for Ouster, Inc. (OUST).
- 1 reported transaction and 0 derivative rows are listed below.
- Accepted by SEC: 10 Nov 2026, 17:54.
Change
- Previous filing in this sequence was filed on 02 Sep 2026.
- Current net transaction value: -$170,000.
Research use
- This tells you what this filing adds before you inspect full transaction and derivative tables.
- You can trace every row back to the original SEC filing document.
Evidence
Filed on Form 4
Ownership activity is grounded in SEC Form 4 disclosures.
View source filing
Reporting Owners (1)
CIK 0001224172
Primary reporting owner
SKAGGS STEPHEN A
- Relationship
-
Director
- Address
- 350 TREAT AVENUE, SAN FRANCISCO
- Signature
- /s/ Megan Chung, as Attorney-in-Fact for Stephen A. Skaggs
- Signature date
- 10 Nov 2026
Reported non-derivative transactions
Shares, units, or other non-derivative securities reported in this filing.
OUST
transaction
Common Stock
Sale
- Transaction value
- -$170,000
- Shares
- -5,000
- Change %
- -8.1%
- Price
-
$34.00
- Shares after
- 56,415
- Date
- 06 Nov 2026
- Ownership
- Direct
- Footnotes
- F1
* marks a reported price that did not pass the local price check.
Rule 10b5-1 trading plan
These transactions were reported as open-market trades under a Rule 10b5-1 plan. The plan lets an insider set trading instructions in advance, which can reduce the risk of trading while in possession of material nonpublic information.
Original filing language: transaction made pursuant to a contract, instruction, or written plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of responses
1 footnote