-
Signature
-
/s/ Kimberly Mather, Attorney-in-Fact for Michael Chi
-
Issuer symbol
-
HIMS
-
Transactions as of
-
07 Mar 2025
-
Net transactions value
-
-$108,171
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
25 Sep 2025, 18:06:50 UTC
Reporting Owners (1)
| Name |
Relationship |
Address |
Signature |
Signature date |
CIK |
| Chi Michael |
Chief Commercial Officer |
2269 CHESTNUT STREET, #523, SAN FRANCISCO |
/s/ Kimberly Mather, Attorney-in-Fact for Michael Chi |
25 Sep 2025 |
0001965903 |
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Gift |
$0 |
-5,700 |
-1.9% |
$0.000000 |
291,439 |
07 Mar 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$10,521 |
+2,100 |
+0.72% |
$5.01 |
293,539 |
24 Sep 2025 |
Direct |
F2 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$118,692 |
-2,100 |
-0.72% |
$56.52 |
291,439 |
24 Sep 2025 |
Direct |
F2 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-2,100 |
-1.2% |
$0.000000 |
174,042 |
24 Sep 2025 |
Class A Common Stock |
2,100 |
$5.01 |
Direct |
F2, F3 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: