-
Signature
-
/s/ Kimberly Mather, Attorney-in-Fact for Oluyemi Okupe
-
Issuer symbol
-
HIMS
-
Transactions as of
-
26 Aug 2025
-
Net transactions value
-
-$447,947
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
28 Aug 2025, 16:34:15 UTC
Reporting Owners (1)
| Name |
Relationship |
Address |
Signature |
Signature date |
CIK |
| Okupe Oluyemi |
Chief Financial Officer |
2269 CHESTNUT STREET, #523, SAN FRANCISCO |
/s/ Kimberly Mather, Attorney-in-Fact for Oluyemi Okupe |
28 Aug 2025 |
0001907056 |
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$58,021 |
+11,581 |
+9.9% |
$5.01 |
128,387 |
26 Aug 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$505,968 |
-11,581 |
-9% |
$43.69 |
116,806 |
26 Aug 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| holding |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
7,853 |
26 Aug 2025 |
Held by Oluyemi Okupe Separate Property Trust dtd 9-1-2021 |
|
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-11,581 |
-3.2% |
$0.000000 |
349,784 |
26 Aug 2025 |
Class A Common Stock |
11,581 |
$5.01 |
Direct |
F1, F3 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: