-
Signature
-
/s/ Alexandra Cotter Wilkins, Attorney-in-Fact
-
Issuer symbol
-
HIMS
-
Transactions as of
-
25 Nov 2024
-
Net transactions value
-
-$2,531,638
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
26 Nov 2024, 18:32:46 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$489,858 |
+97,776 |
+87% |
$5.01 |
209,962 |
25 Nov 2024 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$36,970 |
-1,391 |
-0.66% |
$26.58 |
208,571 |
25 Nov 2024 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$26,499 |
-997 |
-0.48% |
$26.58 |
207,574 |
25 Nov 2024 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$245,016 |
-9,193 |
-4.4% |
$26.65 |
198,381 |
25 Nov 2024 |
Direct |
F1, F3 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$2,713,011 |
-90,412 |
-45% |
$30.01 |
109,392 |
25 Nov 2024 |
Direct |
F1, F4, F5 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-97,776 |
-18% |
$0.000000 |
439,048 |
25 Nov 2024 |
Class A Common Stock |
97,776 |
$5.01 |
Direct |
F1, F6 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: