-
Signature
-
/s/ Alexandra Cotter Wilkins, Attorney-in-Fact
-
Issuer symbol
-
HIMS
-
Transactions as of
-
15 Mar 2024
-
Net transactions value
-
-$155,883
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
19 Mar 2024, 18:37:29 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
|
+10,044 |
|
|
10,044 |
15 Mar 2024 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$155,883 |
-10,044 |
-100% |
$15.52 |
0 |
19 Mar 2024 |
Direct |
F2 |
| holding |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
157,874 |
15 Mar 2024 |
Held by Define Ventures Fund I, L.P. |
F3 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Restricted Stock Unit |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-9,134 |
-25% |
$0.000000 |
27,401 |
15 Mar 2024 |
Class A Common Stock |
9,134 |
|
Direct |
F1, F4 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Restricted Stock Unit |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-893 |
-25% |
$0.000000 |
2,681 |
15 Mar 2024 |
Class A Common Stock |
893 |
|
Direct |
F1, F4 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Restricted Stock Unit |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-17 |
-24% |
$0.000000 |
54 |
15 Mar 2024 |
Class A Common Stock |
17 |
|
Direct |
F1, F4 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: