-
Signature
-
/s/ Alexandra Cotter Wilkins, Attorney-in-Fact
-
Issuer symbol
-
HIMS
-
Transactions as of
-
05 May 2023
-
Net transactions value
-
-$382,482
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
09 May 2023, 18:16:02 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$109,950 |
-9,133 |
-2.1% |
$12.04 |
426,412 |
05 May 2023 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$119,183 |
-9,899 |
-2.3% |
$12.04 |
416,513 |
05 May 2023 |
Direct |
F1, F3 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$108,013 |
-9,133 |
-2.2% |
$11.83 |
407,380 |
08 May 2023 |
Direct |
F1, F4 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$45,336 |
-3,833 |
-0.94% |
$11.83 |
403,547 |
08 May 2023 |
Direct |
F1, F5 |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$7,613 |
+19,032 |
+4.7% |
$0.4000* |
422,579 |
08 May 2023 |
Direct |
F6 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
HIMS |
Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$7,613 |
-19,032 |
-2.1% |
$0.4000* |
906,632 |
05 May 2023 |
Class A Common Stock |
19,032 |
$0.4000 |
Direct |
F7 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: