-
Signature
-
/s/ Casey O'Connor, Attorney-in-Fact for Anthony Bacos
-
Issuer symbol
-
SFIX
-
Transactions as of
-
22 Jul 2025
-
Net transactions value
-
-$450,345
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
24 Jul 2025, 20:30:59 UTC
Reporting Owners (1)
| Name |
Relationship |
Address |
Signature |
Signature date |
CIK |
| Bacos Anthony |
Chief Prod/Technology Officer |
1 MONTGOMERY STREET, SAN FRANCISCO |
/s/ Casey O'Connor, Attorney-in-Fact for Anthony Bacos |
24 Jul 2025 |
0002004694 |
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
SFIX |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$239,400 |
+60,000 |
+7% |
$3.99 |
919,966 |
22 Jul 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
SFIX |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$300,210 |
-60,000 |
-6.5% |
$5.00 |
859,966 |
22 Jul 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
SFIX |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$150,135 |
-30,000 |
-3.5% |
$5.00 |
829,966 |
22 Jul 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F3 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
SFIX |
Employee Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
$239,400 |
-60,000 |
-8.3% |
$3.99 |
662,543 |
22 Jul 2025 |
Class A Common Stock |
60,000 |
$3.99 |
Direct |
F4, F5 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: