-
Signature
-
/s/ Gregory L. Smith, attorney-in-fact
-
Issuer symbol
-
MUSA
-
Transactions as of
-
06 Jan 2026
-
Net transactions value
-
-$2,757,391
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
07 Jan 2026, 18:14:29 UTC
Reporting Owners (1)
| Name |
Relationship |
Address |
Signature |
Signature date |
CIK |
| West Malynda K |
President & CEO |
200 PEACH STREET, EL DORADO |
/s/ Gregory L. Smith, attorney-in-fact |
07 Jan 2026 |
0001381734 |
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
MUSA |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$609,200 |
+8,000 |
+6.8% |
$76.15 |
125,389 |
06 Jan 2026 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
MUSA |
Common Stock |
Tax liability |
$1,644,916 |
-3,949 |
-3.1% |
$416.54 |
121,440 |
06 Jan 2026 |
Direct |
F2 |
| transaction |
MUSA |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$1,721,675 |
-4,051 |
-3.3% |
$425.00 |
117,389 |
07 Jan 2026 |
Direct |
F1 |
| holding |
MUSA |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
873 |
06 Jan 2026 |
401(k) Plan |
F3 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
MUSA |
Stock Option |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-8,000 |
-100% |
$0.000000 |
0 |
06 Jan 2026 |
Common Stock |
8,000 |
$76.15 |
Direct |
F1, F4, F5 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: