-
Signature
-
/s/ Howard Diamond, as Attorney-in-fact for Barry L. Biffle
-
Stock symbol
-
ULCC
-
Transactions as of
-
Jan 3, 2025
-
Transactions value $
-
$306,560
-
Form type
-
4
-
Date filed
-
1/7/2025, 04:49 PM
Transactions Table
Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
transaction |
ULCC |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$784K |
+200K |
+25.48% |
$3.92 |
985K |
Jan 3, 2025 |
Direct |
|
transaction |
ULCC |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$784K |
+200K |
+20.31% |
$3.92 |
1.18M |
Jan 6, 2025 |
Direct |
|
transaction |
ULCC |
Common Stock |
Sale |
-$1.26M |
-160K |
-13.5% |
$7.88 |
1.02M |
Jan 6, 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
holding |
ULCC |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
48.9K |
Jan 3, 2025 |
By Family Trust |
F2 |
holding |
ULCC |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
159K |
Jan 3, 2025 |
By Spouse |
|
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
transaction |
ULCC |
Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-200K |
-14.66% |
$0.00 |
1.16M |
Jan 3, 2025 |
Common Stock |
200K |
$3.92 |
Direct |
F3 |
transaction |
ULCC |
Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-200K |
-17.17% |
$0.00 |
965K |
Jan 6, 2025 |
Common Stock |
200K |
$3.92 |
Direct |
F3 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: