-
Signature
-
/s/ Mark Livingston, Attorney-in-Fact
-
Issuer symbol
-
PGNY
-
Transactions as of
-
26 Dec 2023
-
Net transactions value
-
-$5,281,261
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
28 Dec 2023, 20:19:10 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
PGNY |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$316,360 |
+80,000 |
+90% |
$3.95* |
168,439 |
26 Dec 2023 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
PGNY |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$3,034,760 |
-80,000 |
-47% |
$37.93 |
88,439 |
26 Dec 2023 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
PGNY |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$300,665 |
+76,031 |
+86% |
$3.95* |
164,470 |
27 Dec 2023 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
PGNY |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$2,863,525 |
-76,031 |
-46% |
$37.66 |
88,439 |
27 Dec 2023 |
Direct |
F1, F3 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
PGNY |
Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-80,000 |
-4.7% |
$0.000000 |
1,626,053 |
26 Dec 2023 |
Common Stock |
80,000 |
$3.95 |
Direct |
F4 |
| transaction |
PGNY |
Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-76,031 |
-4.7% |
$0.000000 |
1,550,022 |
27 Dec 2023 |
Common Stock |
76,031 |
$3.95 |
Direct |
F4 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: