-
Signature
-
/s/ Shantale Greenson, attorney-in-fact for David Joseph Gaffin
-
Issuer symbol
-
ALKS
-
Transactions as of
-
02 Mar 2026
-
Net transactions value
-
-$120,108
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
04 Mar 2026, 20:15:36 UTC
Reporting Owners (1)
| Name |
Relationship |
Address |
Signature |
Signature date |
CIK |
| Gaffin David Joseph |
EVP, CLO, Alkermes, Inc. |
900 WINTER STREET, WALTHAM |
/s/ Shantale Greenson, attorney-in-fact for David Joseph Gaffin |
04 Mar 2026 |
0001675905 |
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Ordinary Shares |
Sale |
$59,576 |
-2,034 |
-0.85% |
$29.29 |
237,660 |
02 Mar 2026 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Ordinary Shares |
Sale |
$60,532 |
-2,034 |
-0.86% |
$29.76 |
235,626 |
03 Mar 2026 |
Direct |
F1 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Employee Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Award |
|
+78,292 |
|
$0.000000* |
78,292 |
02 Mar 2026 |
Ordinary Shares |
78,292 |
$30.25 |
Direct |
F2 |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Restricted Stock Unit Award |
Award |
|
+36,364 |
|
$0.000000* |
36,364 |
02 Mar 2026 |
Ordinary Shares |
36,364 |
|
Direct |
F3, F4 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: