-
Signature
-
/s/ Tami Chen, Attorney-in-Fact
-
Issuer symbol
-
NTRA
-
Transactions as of
-
22 Apr 2025
-
Net transactions value
-
-$321,809
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
24 Apr 2025, 21:35:04 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
NTRA |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$44,446 |
-308 |
-0.4% |
$144.30 |
76,160 |
22 Apr 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
NTRA |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$87,645 |
-603 |
-0.79% |
$145.35 |
75,557 |
22 Apr 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F3 |
| transaction |
NTRA |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
|
+1,250 |
+1.7% |
|
76,807 |
22 Apr 2025 |
Direct |
F4 |
| transaction |
NTRA |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$74,616 |
-495 |
-0.64% |
$150.74 |
76,312 |
23 Apr 2025 |
Direct |
F5 |
| transaction |
NTRA |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$85,524 |
-561 |
-0.74% |
$152.45 |
75,751 |
24 Apr 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
NTRA |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$29,577 |
-194 |
-0.26% |
$152.46 |
75,557 |
24 Apr 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
NTRA |
Restricted Stock Unit |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-1,250 |
-33% |
$0.000000 |
2,500 |
22 Apr 2025 |
Common Stock |
1,250 |
|
Direct |
F4, F6 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: