-
Signature
-
/s/ Shanti Ariker
-
Issuer symbol
-
FROG
-
Transactions as of
-
27 Jan 2025
-
Net transactions value
-
-$1,104,620
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
29 Jan 2025, 16:15:19 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
FROG |
Ordinary Shares |
Options Exercise |
$378,000 |
+25,000 |
+4.3% |
$15.12 |
607,394 |
27 Jan 2025 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
FROG |
Ordinary Shares |
Sale |
$875,000 |
-25,000 |
-4.1% |
$35.00 |
582,394 |
27 Jan 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
FROG |
Ordinary Shares |
Options Exercise |
$1,164,605 |
+50,635 |
+8.7% |
$23.00 |
633,029 |
27 Jan 2025 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
FROG |
Ordinary Shares |
Sale |
$1,772,225 |
-50,635 |
-8% |
$35.00 |
582,394 |
27 Jan 2025 |
Direct |
F1 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
FROG |
Employee Share Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-25,000 |
-88% |
$0.000000 |
3,387 |
27 Jan 2025 |
Ordinary Shares |
25,000 |
$15.12 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
FROG |
Employee Share Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-50,635 |
-63% |
$0.000000 |
29,201 |
27 Jan 2025 |
Ordinary Shares |
50,635 |
$23.00 |
Direct |
F2 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: