-
Signature
-
/s/ Tierney Dowling, by power of attorney
-
Issuer symbol
-
DASH
-
Transactions as of
-
02 Jan 2025
-
Net transactions value
-
-$17,678,647
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
03 Jan 2025, 16:05:17 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
DASH |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$775,657 |
+108,332 |
+7222% |
$7.16 |
109,832 |
02 Jan 2025 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
DASH |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$1,587,575 |
-9,400 |
-8.6% |
$168.89 |
100,432 |
02 Jan 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
DASH |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$4,841,454 |
-28,484 |
-28% |
$169.97 |
71,948 |
02 Jan 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F3 |
| transaction |
DASH |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$10,907,033 |
-63,930 |
-89% |
$170.61 |
8,018 |
02 Jan 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F4 |
| transaction |
DASH |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
$1,118,241 |
-6,518 |
-81% |
$171.56 |
1,500 |
02 Jan 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F5 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
DASH |
Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-108,332 |
-6.2% |
$0.000000 |
1,644,152 |
02 Jan 2025 |
Class A Common Stock |
108,332 |
$7.16 |
Direct |
F6 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: