-
Signature
-
/s/ Kjelti Kellough, as attorney in fact for Peter Orlowsky
-
Stock symbol
-
GETY
-
Transactions as of
-
Nov 28, 2023
-
Transactions value $
-
-$19,459
-
Form type
-
4
-
Date filed
-
11/30/2023, 04:30 PM
Transactions Table
Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
transaction |
GETY |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$7.24K |
+3.7K |
+1.86% |
$1.96 |
203K |
Nov 28, 2023 |
Direct |
|
transaction |
GETY |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
-$18.6K |
-3.7K |
-1.83% |
$5.02 |
199K |
Nov 28, 2023 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
transaction |
GETY |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$355 |
+181 |
+0.09% |
$1.96 |
199K |
Nov 29, 2023 |
Direct |
|
transaction |
GETY |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
-$905 |
-181 |
-0.09% |
$5.00 |
199K |
Nov 29, 2023 |
Direct |
F1 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
transaction |
GETY |
Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
-$7.24K |
-3.7K |
-4.19% |
$1.96 |
84.5K |
Nov 28, 2023 |
Class A Common Stock |
3.7K |
$1.96 |
Direct |
F3 |
transaction |
GETY |
Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
-$355 |
-181 |
-0.21% |
$1.96 |
84.3K |
Nov 29, 2023 |
Class A Common Stock |
181 |
$1.96 |
Direct |
F3 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: