-
Signature
-
/s/ Kjelti Kellough, as attorney in fact for Craig Peters
-
Stock symbol
-
GETY
-
Transactions as of
-
Jun 14, 2023
-
Transactions value $
-
-$206,140
-
Form type
-
4
-
Date filed
-
6/16/2023, 05:30 PM
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
GETY |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$110K |
+40.3K |
+5.22% |
$2.74 |
811K |
Jun 14, 2023 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
GETY |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
-$202K |
-40.3K |
-4.96% |
$5.02 |
771K |
Jun 14, 2023 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
GETY |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$2.19K |
+800 |
+0.1% |
$2.74 |
772K |
Jun 15, 2023 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
GETY |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
-$4K |
-800 |
-0.1% |
$5.00 |
771K |
Jun 15, 2023 |
Direct |
F1 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
GETY |
Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
-$110K |
-40.3K |
-1.78% |
$2.74 |
2.22M |
Jun 14, 2023 |
Class A Common Stock |
40.3K |
$2.74 |
Direct |
F3 |
| transaction |
GETY |
Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
-$2.19K |
-800 |
-0.04% |
$2.74 |
2.22M |
Jun 15, 2023 |
Class A Common Stock |
800 |
$2.74 |
Direct |
F3 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: