-
Signature
-
/s/ Thomas P. Meissner, Jr., attorney-in-fact for Robert B. Hevert
-
Issuer symbol
-
UTL
-
Transactions as of
-
27 Jan 2026
-
Net transactions value
-
+$4,500
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
29 Jan 2026, 16:26:58 UTC
Quoteable Key Fact
"Robert B. Hevert filed Form 4 for UNITIL CORP (UTL) on 29 Jan 2026."
Quick Takeaways
- This page summarizes Robert B. Hevert's Form 4 filing for UNITIL CORP (UTL).
- 4 reported transactions and 1 derivative row are listed below.
- Filing timestamp: 29 Jan 2026, 16:26.
What Changed
- Previous filing in this sequence was filed on 29 Jan 2025.
- Current net transaction value: +$4,500.
Why This Matters
- This tells you what this filing adds before you inspect full transaction and derivative tables.
- You can trace every row back to the original SEC filing document.
Reporting Owners (1)
| Name |
Relationship |
Address |
Signature |
Signature date |
CIK |
| Hevert Robert B |
Pres. & Chief Admin Officer |
6 LIBERTY LANE WEST, HAMPTON |
/s/ Thomas P. Meissner, Jr., attorney-in-fact for Robert B. Hevert |
29 Jan 2026 |
0001819134 |
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
UTL |
Common stock, no par value |
Award |
$0 |
+3,740 |
|
$0.000000 |
0 |
27 Jan 2026 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
UTL |
Common stock, no par value |
Award |
$0 |
+3,740 |
|
$0.000000 |
0 |
27 Jan 2026 |
Direct |
F2 |
| transaction |
UTL |
Common stock, no par value |
Award |
$4,500 |
+90 |
+0.25% |
$50.00 |
35,465 |
27 Jan 2026 |
Direct |
F3, F4 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
UTL |
Contingent grant of common stock |
Award |
|
+1,870 |
+58% |
|
5,120 |
27 Jan 2026 |
Common stock |
1,870 |
|
Direct |
F5 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Explanation of Responses: