-
Signature
-
By: /s/ Jo Chen, as Attorney-in-Fact for Eric Venker
-
Issuer symbol
-
ROIV
-
Transactions as of
-
04 May 2023
-
Net transactions value
-
-$706,256
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
08 May 2023, 21:30:55 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
ROIV |
Common Shares |
Options Exercise |
$342,026 |
+88,838 |
+13% |
$3.85 |
764,606 |
04 May 2023 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
ROIV |
Common Shares |
Sale |
$737,355 |
-88,838 |
-12% |
$8.30 |
675,768 |
04 May 2023 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
ROIV |
Common Shares |
Options Exercise |
$235,643 |
+61,206 |
+9.1% |
$3.85 |
736,974 |
08 May 2023 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
ROIV |
Common Shares |
Sale |
$546,570 |
-61,206 |
-8.3% |
$8.93 |
675,768 |
08 May 2023 |
Direct |
F1 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
ROIV |
Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-88,838 |
-0.55% |
$0.000000 |
15,923,114 |
04 May 2023 |
Common Shares |
88,838 |
$3.85 |
Direct |
F2 |
| transaction |
ROIV |
Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-61,206 |
-0.38% |
$0.000000 |
15,861,908 |
08 May 2023 |
Common Shares |
61,206 |
$3.85 |
Direct |
F2 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: