-
Signature
-
/s/ Shantale Greenson, attorney-in-fact for Cato T. Laurencin
-
Issuer symbol
-
ALKS
-
Transactions as of
-
08 Dec 2024
-
Net transactions value
-
-$55,246
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
09 Dec 2024, 20:51:58 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Ordinary Shares |
Options Exercise |
|
+4,163 |
+21% |
|
23,971 |
08 Dec 2024 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Ordinary Shares |
Tax liability |
$30,139 |
-958 |
-4% |
$31.46 |
23,013 |
08 Dec 2024 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
ALKS |
Ordinary Shares |
Options Exercise |
$60,601 |
+2,691 |
+12% |
$22.52 |
25,704 |
09 Dec 2024 |
Direct |
F2 |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Ordinary Shares |
Sale |
$85,708 |
-2,691 |
-10% |
$31.85 |
23,013 |
09 Dec 2024 |
Direct |
F3 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Restricted Stock Unit Award |
Options Exercise |
|
-4,163 |
-100% |
|
0 |
08 Dec 2024 |
Ordinary Shares |
4,163 |
|
Direct |
F1, F4 |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Non Qualified Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-2,691 |
-14% |
$0.000000 |
16,142 |
09 Dec 2024 |
Ordinary Shares |
2,691 |
$22.52 |
Direct |
F2, F5 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: