-
Signature
-
/s/ Shantale Greenson, attorney-in-fact for Cato T. Laurencin
-
Stock symbol
-
ALKS
-
Transactions as of
-
Dec 8, 2024
-
Transactions value $
-
-$55,246
-
Form type
-
4
-
Date filed
-
12/9/2024, 08:51 PM
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Ordinary Shares |
Options Exercise |
|
+4.16K |
+21.02% |
|
24K |
Dec 8, 2024 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Ordinary Shares |
Tax liability |
-$30.1K |
-958 |
-4% |
$31.46 |
23K |
Dec 8, 2024 |
Direct |
|
| transaction |
ALKS |
Ordinary Shares |
Options Exercise |
$60.6K |
+2.69K |
+11.69% |
$22.52 |
25.7K |
Dec 9, 2024 |
Direct |
F2 |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Ordinary Shares |
Sale |
-$85.7K |
-2.69K |
-10.47% |
$31.85 |
23K |
Dec 9, 2024 |
Direct |
F3 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Restricted Stock Unit Award |
Options Exercise |
|
-4.16K |
-100% |
|
0 |
Dec 8, 2024 |
Ordinary Shares |
4.16K |
|
Direct |
F1, F4 |
| transaction |
ALKS |
Non Qualified Stock Option (Right to Buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-2.69K |
-14.29% |
$0.00 |
16.1K |
Dec 9, 2024 |
Ordinary Shares |
2.69K |
$22.52 |
Direct |
F2, F5 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: