-
Signature
-
/s/ Andrew Fisher, Attorney-in-fact for Kathleen A. Rickard
-
Issuer symbol
-
VRNA
-
Transactions as of
-
01 May 2025
-
Net transactions value
-
-$440,350
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
05 May 2025, 16:32:18 UTC
Reporting Owners (1)
| Name |
Relationship |
Address |
Signature |
Signature date |
CIK |
| Rickard Kathleen A. |
Chief Medical Officer |
3 MORE LONDON RIVERSIDE, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM |
/s/ Andrew Fisher, Attorney-in-fact for Kathleen A. Rickard |
05 May 2025 |
0001836883 |
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
VRNA |
Ordinary Shares |
Sale |
$244,663 |
-27,336 |
-1% |
$8.95 |
2,633,320 |
01 May 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F2, F3 |
| transaction |
VRNA |
Ordinary Shares |
Options Exercise |
|
+50,000 |
+1.9% |
|
2,683,320 |
01 May 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F4 |
| transaction |
VRNA |
Ordinary Shares |
Sale |
$195,687 |
-21,864 |
-0.81% |
$8.95 |
2,661,456 |
01 May 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F2, F3, F5 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
VRNA |
Restricted Share Units |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-50,000 |
-17% |
$0.000000 |
250,000 |
01 May 2025 |
Ordinary Shares |
50,000 |
|
Direct |
F1, F4, F6 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: