-
Signature
-
/s/ Richard Steinhart, as Attorney in Fact for Vimal Mehta, Ph.D.
-
Issuer symbol
-
BTAI
-
Transactions as of
-
14 Jun 2024
-
Net transactions value
-
-$2,739
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
18 Jun 2024, 21:24:43 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
BTAI |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
|
+2,609 |
+6% |
|
46,173 |
14 Jun 2024 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
BTAI |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
|
+3,500 |
+7.6% |
|
49,673 |
15 Jun 2024 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
BTAI |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$2,739 |
-2,134 |
-4.3% |
$1.28 |
47,539 |
17 Jun 2024 |
Direct |
F2, F3 |
| holding |
BTAI |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
14 Jun 2024 |
By spouse |
|
| holding |
BTAI |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
7,685,501 |
14 Jun 2024 |
By BioXcel LLC |
F4 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
BTAI |
Restricted Stock Units |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-2,609 |
-12% |
$0.000000 |
18,266 |
14 Jun 2024 |
Common Stock |
2,609 |
|
Direct |
F1, F5 |
| transaction |
BTAI |
Restricted Stock Units |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-3,500 |
-8.3% |
$0.000000 |
38,500 |
15 Jun 2024 |
Common Stock |
3,500 |
|
Direct |
F1, F6 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: