-
Signature
-
/s/ Dario Scimeca, Attorney-in-Fact for J. Jefferson Smith
-
Issuer symbol
-
DTIL
-
Transactions as of
-
20 Jan 2025
-
Net transactions value
-
-$49,275
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
22 Jan 2025, 21:00:03 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
DTIL |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
|
+29,168 |
+43% |
|
97,727 |
20 Jan 2025 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
DTIL |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$49,275 |
-10,287 |
-11% |
$4.79 |
87,440 |
22 Jan 2025 |
Direct |
F3 |
| holding |
DTIL |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
7,931 |
20 Jan 2025 |
By Charitable Remainder Unitrust |
|
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
DTIL |
Restricted Stock Units |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-2,500 |
-50% |
$0.000000 |
2,500 |
20 Jan 2025 |
Common Stock |
2,500 |
|
Direct |
F2, F4 |
| transaction |
DTIL |
Restricted Stock Units |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-10,449 |
-33% |
$0.000000 |
20,894 |
20 Jan 2025 |
Common Stock |
10,449 |
|
Direct |
F2, F5 |
| transaction |
DTIL |
Restricted Stock Units |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-16,219 |
-33% |
$0.000000 |
32,438 |
20 Jan 2025 |
Common Stock |
16,219 |
|
Direct |
F2, F6 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: