-
Signature
-
/s/ Erin Guldiken, attorney-in-fact for Aaron Anderson
-
Stock symbol
-
META
-
Transactions as of
-
May 15, 2024
-
Transactions value $
-
-$434,204
-
Form type
-
4
-
Date filed
-
5/17/2024, 08:12 PM
Transactions Table
Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
transaction |
META |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
+1.45K |
+65.45% |
$0.00 |
3.67K |
May 15, 2024 |
Direct |
|
transaction |
META |
Class A Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
+332 |
+9.05% |
$0.00 |
4K |
May 15, 2024 |
Direct |
|
transaction |
META |
Class A Common Stock |
Tax liability |
-$418K |
-885 |
-22.13% |
$471.85 |
3.12K |
May 15, 2024 |
Direct |
F1 |
transaction |
META |
Class A Common Stock |
Sale |
-$16.6K |
-35 |
-1.12% |
$474.75 |
3.08K |
May 15, 2024 |
Direct |
F2 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
transaction |
META |
Restricted Stock Units (RSU) (Class A) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-1.45K |
-7.7% |
$0.00 |
17.4K |
May 15, 2024 |
Class A Common Stock |
1.45K |
|
Direct |
F3, F4 |
transaction |
META |
Restricted Stock Units (RSU) (Class A) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-332 |
-6.24% |
$0.00 |
4.99K |
May 15, 2024 |
Class A Common Stock |
332 |
|
Direct |
F3, F5 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: