-
Signature
-
/s/ Joshua B. Cohen, as Attorney in Fact
-
Issuer symbol
-
AMLX
-
Transactions as of
-
17 Apr 2023
-
Net transactions value
-
-$1,464,884
-
Form type
-
4
-
Filing time
-
19 Apr 2023, 19:45:13 UTC
Transactions Table
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
AMLX |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$16,599 |
+44,861 |
+22% |
$0.3700* |
253,278 |
17 Apr 2023 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
AMLX |
Common Stock |
Options Exercise |
$32,460 |
+4,718 |
+1.9% |
$6.88 |
257,996 |
17 Apr 2023 |
Direct |
F1 |
| transaction |
AMLX |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$1,504,660 |
-49,279 |
-19% |
$30.53 |
208,717 |
17 Apr 2023 |
Direct |
F1, F2 |
| transaction |
AMLX |
Common Stock |
Sale |
$9,282 |
-300 |
-0.14% |
$30.94 |
208,417 |
17 Apr 2023 |
Direct |
F1 |
Derivative Securities (e.g., puts, calls, warrants, options, convertible securities)
| Type |
Sym |
Class |
Transaction |
Value $ |
Shares |
Change % |
* Price $ |
Shares After |
Date |
Underlying Class |
Amount |
Exercise Price |
Ownership |
Footnotes |
| transaction |
AMLX |
Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-44,861 |
-72% |
$0.000000 |
17,605 |
17 Apr 2023 |
Common Stock |
44,861 |
$0.3700 |
Direct |
F1, F3 |
| transaction |
AMLX |
Stock Option (right to buy) |
Options Exercise |
$0 |
-4,718 |
-9.8% |
$0.000000 |
43,534 |
17 Apr 2023 |
Common Stock |
4,718 |
$6.88 |
Direct |
F1, F4 |
* An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.
Buy Plan / Sale Plan: These are also open market purchases/sales of shares, but in this case the transaction is part of a trading plan. Rule 10b5-1 allows insiders to setup a trading plan to buy/sell stocks over a certain period of time. Since the purchases/sales are predetermined, this protects the insiders from violating insider trading law.
Transaction was made pursuant to a contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of equity securities of the issuer that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c).
Explanation of Responses: