Se Flossbach von Storch

Holdings History for YUM BRANDS INC - Common Stock (YUM)

Symbol: YUM on NYSE
Investment type: Equity / Common Stock

Shares, Excluding Options vs Price

Value, Excluding Options

Holdings date	Weight	Change	Value $	Shares	Change	Activity %	Price	All Holders
30 Sep 2018		-0.01%	$0	0	-10,400	-100%	$159.57	Q3 2018
30 Jun 2018	0.01%	0%	$813,000	10,400	0		$78.17	Q2 2018
31 Mar 2018	0.01%	0%	$885,000	10,400	0		$85.10	Q1 2018
31 Dec 2017	0.01%	0%	$849,000	10,400	0		$81.63	Q4 2017
30 Sep 2017	0.01%	0%	$766,000	10,400	0		$73.65	Q3 2017
30 Jun 2017	0.01%	0%	$767,000	10,400	0		$73.75	Q2 2017
31 Mar 2017	0.01%	-0%	$665,000	10,400	-2,350	-18%	$63.94	Q1 2017
31 Dec 2016	0.01%	0%	$807,000	12,750	0		$63.29	Q4 2016
30 Sep 2016	0.02%	0%	$1,158,000	12,750	0		$90.82	Q3 2016
30 Jun 2016	0.02%	0%	$1,057,000	12,750	0		$82.90	Q2 2016
31 Mar 2016	0.02%	0%	$1,044,000	12,750	0		$81.88	Q1 2016
31 Dec 2015	0.02%	0%	$931,000	12,750	0		$73.02	Q4 2015
30 Sep 2015	0.02%	0%	$1,019,000	12,750	0		$79.92	Q3 2015
30 Jun 2015	0.02%	0%	$1,149,000	12,750	0		$90.12	Q2 2015
31 Mar 2015	0.02%	0%	$1,004,000	12,750	0		$78.75	Q1 2015
31 Dec 2014	0.02%	0%	$929,000	12,750	0		$72.86	Q4 2014
30 Sep 2014	0.02%	0%	$918,000	12,750	0		$72.00	Q3 2014
30 Jun 2014	0.02%	-0%	$1,035,000	12,750	-750	-5.6%	$81.18	Q2 2014
31 Mar 2014	0.03%	-0.01%	$1,018,000	13,500	-2,750	-17%	$75.41	Q1 2014
31 Dec 2013	0.04%	-0.58%	$1,229,000	16,250	-268,920	-94%	$75.63	Q4 2013
30 Sep 2013	0.63%	-0.38%	$20,358,000	285,170	-172,000	-38%	$71.39	Q3 2013
30 Jun 2013	0.96%	-0.38%	$31,700,000	457,170	-182,700	-29%	$69.34	Q2 2013
31 Mar 2013	1.8%	+0.56%	$46,032,000	639,870	+204,700	+47%	$71.94	Q1 2013
31 Dec 2012	1.5%	+0.46%	$28,895,000	435,170	+130,050	+43%	$66.40	Q4 2012
30 Sep 2012	1.5%	+1.5%	$20,242,000	305,120	+305,120	NEW	$66.34	Q3 2012

* Reported Price is the price of the security as of the portfolio date. This value is significant in that it is the last known price at which the security was still held.
An asterisk sign (*) next to the price indicates that the price is likely invalid.